Comments on: Heart Rate Monitor

By: claudruiz

claudruiz — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 09:40:51 +0000

What I mean is the video is about beginners, noobs and fat burn not serious athletic performance and/or from people who are already in shape and maybe need more monitoring in their sport. There’s a difference.

By: claudruiz

claudruiz — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 09:38:45 +0000

I go to the gym, ride bikes, run and I do push myself quite a lot, most people in the gym don’t at all and I’ve rarely even seen people break sweat (I sweat buckets when I train). They could work out harder but for beginners since they don’t have the experience of long duration aerobic training, or maybe even enjoy it (?), probably a HRM makes no difference. Not sure, maybe I’ll give one a go and see how I get on, just for curiosity’s sake.

By: claudruiz

claudruiz — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 09:35:14 +0000

I’m still undecided about buying a HRM. I think HRMs are better for more serious athletes who need extra monitoring and have the experience to know their body. A combination of both can help I guess.

By: nector1592

nector1592 — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:53:09 +0000

do you think that what one’s heart rate is during exercise is a good indicator of how many calories they burn, regardless of what they are doing?

By: ysherbini

ysherbini — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 05:18:01 +0000

I think HRM is great peace of tech everybody should have. why not to get more info about what are you doing , it’s like a care , you should have information when you drive it.